Eric Thomas <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> The origin seems to be 195.2.126.185, which is somewhere in Latvia. =
> ERNA1 is not a valid BITNET node. The order of the fields suggests that
> "From:" and "Date:" may have been added at cs.umb.edu, perhaps because
> they were missing. But there is no conclusive proof of this.

Interesting, thanks Eric -- I'll try searching Latvia. Any idea why only
messages from that one sender are generating these errors? Also, is it of
any relevance that the port on the remote machine seems to change with each
error? E.g.

Received: from erna1 (195.2.126.185:3056) by listserv.iupui.edu
Received: from erna1 (195.2.126.185:2972) by listserv.iupui.edu
Received: from erna1 (195.2.126.185:4360) by listserv.iupui.edu

peter