Rich Helmke <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I looked at this problem last winter and came to the same conclusion. > Some of my "remote" subscribers are using certain mailing systems > that populate the From: or Reply-To: fields with the full list and > server addresses which causes grief for the "loopcheck" and > apparently the LOOPCHECK= 'all or nothing' feature does not allow > this level of detail. I must admit I was disappointed. I know this isn't a BUG in the traditional sense. But it sure seems like an area for improvement. Maybe a request for a new feature? Please? + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes [log in to unmask] Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes Computer Systems Manager ph: 979-845-7801 Department of Physics fax: 979-845-2590 Texas A&M University