At 21:42 10/28/2004 Thursday, Mike Satake wrote: >* Send= Private,Semi-Moderated >* Editor= <some-address> > >based on the site manager's manual (for LISTSERV 1.8e), with this list >setting, subscriber posts without the use of 'Urgent:' in the subject >line will be sent to the moderator for approval. When tested, subscriber >posts sent to the list bypass moderation without the use of 'Urgent:' in >the subject line. > >Posts from subscribers with 'Urgent:' in the subject line bypass >moderation as expected. And posts from non-subscribers are rejected >regardlessly, as expected. The only problem is that subscriber posts that >don't use 'Urgent:' bypass moderation. Needless to say, since we don't have all of the facts, we are just conjecturing. To have all the facts would require a list of the EDITOR= value, a list distribution with ALL of the headers including a possible SENDER:, and finally a Q listname FOR poster@host >#2 When the list has: > >* Send= Editor,Semi-Moderated >* Editor= <some-address> > >based on the site manager's manual, this is will cause all posts to the >list to go to the moderators for approval unless 'Urgent:' is placed in >the subject line. However, when tested, if 'Urgent:' is placed in the >subject line, the post is rejected even though the poster is a subscriber. >If the poster doesn't use 'Urgent:' then the post is sent to the >moderator, as expected. That of course is NOT true if the poster is an EDITOR (which can be based upon the list definition keyword EDITOR= or the poster's "reserved" SET option. I wonder if template processing for CONTENT_FILTER could be involved? That certainly would obfuscate. /Pete /P