Pete Weiss wrote: > At 15:11 11/19/2004 Friday, [log in to unmask] wrote: > >What does this do for senders that only include the HTML part with no > >plain text part? > > I believe it will totally reject the posting with a nastygram back to > the poster (in 1.8(e)). In 1.8d sometimes the message will show up as HTML, and sometimes with all the embedded codes right out there for everyone to see. I believe a rejection template was a request for future versions. Speaking of rejections -- I just had an experience where I approved a post, and received the confirmation, but it never went out or showed up in the archives. Finally I copied and pasted it from the approval message, and sent it myself. At which point it was rejected for exceeding the set number of lines. I counted the lines and apparently the "approved by" line inserted by the listserv was what pushed it over. I don't know if the rejection was sent to the original poster, but I had no idea what had happened until I tried to send the post myself. Karen Reznek