From: "Wayne T Smith" <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 10:20 AM > Given the wide variety of reasons a subscriber might set an address to > NOMAIL, I see no good way to separate the wheat from the chaff! So I > remain very happy using passive probing and ignoring my NOMAIL > subscriptions. I guess I wanted to deal with all out-of-date subscriptions (including the NOMAIL cases) because the manual and the message content led to believe that the renewal probes should yield error detection. Maybe revising my expectations is my best approach. Does that mean I should use Auto-Delete= Probe(some number N) coupled with Renewal= Probe to avoid the requirement of a response? As I understand it, the Auto-Delete= passive probing only operates on subscriptions that are subject to renewal. Obviously, if the message doesn't actually detect any errors, I need to rewrite my PROBE1 template to reflect what's happening (or what I want the subscribers to understand is happening). Hal