Well we have text; html and aol version is there a better way to do it? Sorry I'm new in the universe of email. :P -----Original Message----- From: LISTSERV site administrators' forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Valdis Kletnieks Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 4:30 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Bounced Email On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:25:23 -0400, Bruno Robichaud said: > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="123456789123456789abcd" > > --123456789123456789abcd > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > ' + @BodyTEXT + ' > > --123456789123456789abcd > Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > ' + @BodyHTML + ' > > --123456789123456789abcd > Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > ' + @BodyAOL + ' Gaak. Two *different* text/html bodyparts in a multipart/alternative? Pray tell, how does the MUA choose which one to display? And is there a problem with using *one* text/html that's actually standards-compliant rather than standards-complacent? ;)