Unless he sisnt' send two copies just now, it's his system. I got one from the following received header path (minus the LSOFT paths): Received: from 212.137.44.177 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0m) with TCP; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:23:39 -0500 Received: from avas-checker by relay-outbound-2 with esmtp (Relay-Software 4.52) id 1FPKXL-0005ds-6Y for [log in to unmask]; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:23:39 +0100 Received: from relay.nhs.uk by rlavas02 with ESMTP id ASD11721; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:23:38 +0100 (BST) Received: from [10.49.11.50] (helo=byland) by relay-inbound-3 with esmtpa (Relay-Software 4.52) id 1FPKXK-0002gI-AN for [log in to unmask]; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:23:38 +0100 Received: from sout1lds.nhs.uk ([192.168.112.86]) by byland with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:24:06 +0100 Received: from exchpe.nhsia.nhs.uk ([10.149.115.48]) by sout1lds.nhs.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:23:37 +0100 And the other from this path: Received: from 212.137.44.177 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0m) with TCP; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 07:43:55 -0500 Received: from avas-checker by relay-outbound-1 with esmtp (Relay-Software 4.52) id 1FPIyo-0007gH-5m for [log in to unmask]; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:43:54 +0100 Received: from relay.nhs.uk by rlavas01 with ESMTP id ASI72743; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:43:54 +0100 (BST) Received: from [10.49.11.50] (helo=byland) by relay-inbound-6 with esmtpa (Relay-Software 4.52) id 1FPIyo-0007UJ-JY for [log in to unmask]; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:43:54 +0100 Received: from sout2lds.nhsia.nhs.uk ([192.168.112.87]) by byland with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:44:22 +0100 Received: from exchpe.nhsia.nhs.uk ([10.149.115.48]) by sout2lds.nhsia.nhs.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:43:53 +0100 Looks like that first exchange server is duplicating the message or his MUA is. --On March 31, 2006 9:32:27 AM -0500 Pete Weiss <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Are they *actually* being distributed again by the list? > > If so, what are your LOOPCHECK= parms? > > It may be necessary to have subscribers self-moderate, or a list-moderator > > it may be that that a subscriber's MUA or possibly MTA is effectively > resending the original > > It is really really necessary to see complete RECEIVED headers to start > to hone in of the problem. > > /Pete Weiss > -- "Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its possessors into trouble of all kinds." -- Samuel Butler