> -----Original Message----- > From: LISTSERV site administrators' forum [mailto:LSTSRV- > [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Valdis Kletnieks > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 2:39 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: send=editor question > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:22:41 CST, Al Lilianstrom said: > > We have a number of announce only lists set up with send=editor which > works > > great. It was brought to our attention today that if an editor is > also a list > > member that they don't get a copy of any mail that they send to the > list. Is > > this the expected behavior? > > The fact they're an editor is probably a red herring. For *all* lists, > whether > a subscriber gets a copy back is governed by the REPRO setting. Right. We have a web form that users use to request a list and REPRO is a default option in the list configuration that is generated by the form. It's been that way for so long that I forgot all about the setting. The list in question was created manually so the default-options was never set. > If the person wants a copy, they should send Listserv the command: > > SET listname REPRO > > (Also, check whether the list has a Default-Options: set...) > > Ignore this if the user actually *has* REPRO set and still isn't > getting > a copy - that would be a different issue. ;) Thanks for the help. al -- Al Lilianstrom CD/LSC/CSI/CSG [log in to unmask]