On: Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 08:56:29AM -0500,Jan Guthrie Wrote: } Along these lines, I am consider our currently "plain text" list to } allow HTML. But, when I decided just to allow attachments, it was } a huge problem having to change the type of digest that each member } received. The most commonly used version of digest just showed } "miles" of code instead of the pictures. } } If I change the list to allow HTML, does anyone know the immediate } effect of those on digest? Make them either DIGEST MIME or DIGEST HTML. Either will give a list of posts with a link to see the actual post. MIME works better with some mailers, HTML works better with others. -- Rich Greenberg Sarasota, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com + 1 941 378 2097 Eastern time. N6LRT I speak for myself & my dogs only. VM'er since CP-67 Canines: Val, Red, Shasta, Zero & Casey (At the bridge) Owner:Chinook-L Canines: Red & Cinnar (Siberians) Retired at the beach Asst Owner:Sibernet-L ############################ To unsubscribe from the LSTOWN-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=LSTOWN-L&A=1