>That is a valid topic... we should perhaps set some 'standard' for ARPA >redistributions. Correct me if I'm wrong, but redistributions here are: > Language= ARPA Reply-to= "arpa.list.address" > Send= Editor Editor= myself,arpa.list.address > Owner= myself,arpa.list.owner > >This allows submissions 'from' the list to be redistributed without any >question, and anything sent 'to' the list pops in my reader to validate. >(Don't set the arpa.list.address as first owner or editor :-) ). This works fine unless the ARPA list is one like INFO-VAX where all mail is simply being re-directed to the list by a server machine somewhere out there in ARPAland. Each piece of mail comes in with a completely different set of headers, with no way to know if it is valid or not... Harold