REPLY TO 06/12/87 12:39 FROM [log in to unmask]: Re: possible solution for usenet-listserv peering >Seems to me that getting all of the other-net list mailers to implement >a complete solution would be difficult. > right on! >Perhaps a satisfactory alternative that is implemented totally within >LISTSERV would be to allow lists to be declared "subserviant" in addition >to peered. A subserviant list would have a "master" on another >network. Mail traffic apparently from the master (identified by either >which network it came from, or which user from a list of possibilities, >or...) would be distributed as per normal. Mail traffic not from the >master (probably meaning from a Bitnet host) would be forwarded to >the master AND NOT DISTRIBUTED. (I assume we'll catch a copy returned >by the master and distribute that.) > >-JSFisher > I love it! To: [log in to unmask]