>> [...] , you know this executable form of documentation with file type >> EXEC. Maybe they should be included in the INFO FILELIST to solve the >> problem with the gap between documented past and coded reality. Arrgh, >> Thomas, keep your big mouth shut, better try to complete your own doc >> for your very own mess instead of provoking nastygrams from Eric, >> especially because your trying to explain a bug in the Listserv's >> executable documentation, and not in the documentation of the executables :-) > > N o f u r t h e r c o m m e n t > >--Frank Ok, too much for me. You seem to feel entitled to make ironic comments about every little part of LISTSERV which is still not finished, as if you were paying for it or for the service it provides. Do you realize, by chance, that Eric is getting *nothing* from EARN (or from BITNIC, now that we are in it) for LISTSERV? Do you realize that if all the LISTSERV servers in the world (for which we are not paying) stopped today, tomorrow we would have the major traffic bottleneck never seen in the net? (Or complete stop of all lists and more than half of well known packages and file traffic distribution, whatever you prefer). Have you never spent some time to carefully read one of the docs that are so outdated? Never seen a 3820 version? Have you compared that to the docs produced by official people in the net (people who are paid)? If the answer to any of these questions is 'No', I'd suggest you take the appropriate steps to get better informed about a topic before starting to make unreasonable critizisms -- if it's 'Yes', then my diagnostic is a serious incompatibility problem with LISTSERV, in which case you should immediately signoff to preserve your mental stability. In any case, PLEASE stop sending this kind of garbage to the list. I will sincerely appreciate it. Jose Maria