I had complained earlier about the LISTS database at TCSVM not recognizing the deletion of the ARPABBS list at RPICICGE. I was sent regular "warnings" about problems with the list-id consistency. Response: update was probably lost in a cold start or otherwise lost, don't worry. Several refresh commands were sent. Even if that didn't work the monthly checksum would take care or the problem. It has now been about three months since the list was deleted and the "warnings" are still coming. I have checked the LISTS database at several sites, including all peers for the list. The only node which still believes in ARPABBS@RPICICGE is TCSVM, several others have duplicate entries for the other peers, but only TCSVM shows the RPICICGE entry. Suggestions? Thanks for your help. Michael -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 5 Sep 1988 16:02 CDT From: Revised List Processor <LISTSERV@TCSVM> Subject: Message To: Michael Smith <MNSMITH@UMAECS> Warning: a possible inconsistency in the network-wide "List-ID" of list ARPABBS has been detected. Please ensure that it does correspond to the peered chain: ARPABBS@FINHUTC ARPABBS@RPICICGE ARPABBS@TCSVM [log in to unmask]