First of all, I want to apologize for for my previous mail commenting Jose's mail....my fingers hit SEND too early... Anyway, I only wanted to add to the previous mail, that me too, I'd pay to get (or get the services of) listSERV and not listEARN. > >In my opinion if someone doesn't know whether he's on EARN or not he should >not reply to such a survey. survey agree. >>3- When we read the two mails Eric sent to NAD-F about French people answers >> we decided to remove him from this list and to change it to "send=private" >> because we DO NOT WANT any polemic on this list. Moreover, Eric is not a >> french Node ADministrator and we don't afford his nasty comments. >> >>We hope that everything is clear now, > >Two comments: nothing is clear now, since you have not offered us any copy of >Eric's supossedly 'nasty' mails, and therefore we have no means to judge how >nasty they were, and have to ressort to trust (in you or Eric) to decide >whether you're right; and I don't find it nice to kick off a person from a >list just because of a mail, even if it were nasty, since this is clearly an >act of censorship which does only befit an authoritarian structure, not a open >forum for free interchange and dialog. Finally: ALL NAD lists should be open, >so that people from other countries can send there if needed (German lists >are); and I do not like how this affaire has been presented to the network. > >When sending this mail, my intention is not to open an argument about this >topic, but only to show that not everybody implicitly agrees with your >methods. > >>Dominique and Dominique (EARN-France permanent team) > > Jose Maria (speaking as a representative of Jose Maria) I too, must say that the reaction to Eric's "nasty" (maybe they were, who knows, I haven't read them) notes, is far from the one I'd expect in an open libral society... /Zvika