I have received a number of questions regarding the survey, which I would like to answer publicly. If you would like to correct your answers in light of these clarifications, please send me mail and I will delete your reply; do NOT resend an answer before I have deleted your previous one. 1. LISTSERV maintainer means "LISTSERV postmaster". If you are a list owner or a file owner, you are not a LISTSERV maintainer. 2. The vendor mentioned in the first section of the survey would NOT be IBM. If IBM bought LISTSERV, it would be to throw it away so that it doesn't compete with their GroupTalk (aka GRAND) product. It would be a serious company, though, most probably based in the US (as most of these companies are). I have a name in mind but don't want to give it at this stage. 3. The purpose of the question about the amount of money you would be willing to pay for LISTSERV is only to show how much money I could have got if I had decided that from now on, LISTSERV is no longer free to the network. This is a way to tell our politicians "I've made a gift of $nnnk to you, how dare you say that I'm 'blackmailing' you?". Please be assured that this number would NOT be used to determine the license fee if LISTSERV became a commercial product - the vendor would make its own marketing study and assign prices/discounts according to its own policies. Therefore there is no point in answering "$50" in an attempt to lower the average; you can't obviously expect to get a product like LISTSERV for 50 dollars OTC, unless you meant you'd be willing to pay only for the tapes, in which case this answer is valid. 4. Since the aforesaid question does not refer to what you would expect the vendor to sell LISTSERV for, but to what your site would be willing to pay, please answer with the amount of money your site would be willing to write on the check, not with what the license cost would be assuming 40% academic discount, etc. 5. The question on what you think LISTSERV would cost your site if you had to re-create it was perhaps not clear enough. I didn't mean to ask how much you would be willing to invest to write a piece of software with similar functionality for the sole use of your institution, which may be interested only in part of the functions provided by LISTSERV. I want you to tell me how much you think it would cost you to rewrite LISTSERV if you had to, assuming that your management asked you for a functionally equivalent implementation and was willing to provide the required credits. This is only a way to determine the financial cost and value of LISTSERV - there are other questions at the beginning about its functional value. I would like to thank the 50 or so people who have answered the survey so far (which is a lot considering that FINHUTC has been down for a long time). However, because of the important standard deviation I have observed on some of the questions, and because of the way the results are displayed as "total" plus EARN vs non-EARN, postmaster vs user, etc, I cannot release the results of the survey unless I get at least 150-200 answers, which should not be a problem if each LISTSERV site answered the survey. Eric