> >I have not received BITNEWS for some time either. I was assuming that > >none had been sent. Is that wrong? > > >Roger > > I haven't pulled the archive since early May so I'm not sure either > if there has been anything new but I'd be willing to bet there has > been. At the time I last pulled it there were several items, > including the ones about all the staff changes at BITNIC, that we > had never received here. SLACVM is also not getting BITNEWS and > there were some reports that at least some people at Cornell were > also not getting it so it doesn't appear to be a strictly geographic > problem. The only thing I could guess is that somehow the large > size of that list caused it to break after sending stuff to only > part of the list (STANFORD and SLACVM both being toward the end), > but if Cornell isn't getting things either that theory wouldn't > appear to hold up either as I believe all their nodes start with C. > > /June I pulled the archives and found several BITNEWS messages that I had not received. The problem seems to have started around early to mid April. The latest posting in the archives is dated June 27.