On Wed, 27 Sep 89 08:57:53 IST Zvika Bar-Deroma said: >On Mon, 25 Sep 89 14:04:37 SET Christian J. Reichetzeder said: >>On Mon, 25 Sep 89 12:19:15 IST Zvika Bar-Deroma said: >>>I got complaints from users subscribed to SAS-L, .... >>>The users get their SAS-L list distributed from [log in to unmask] >>> >>Haven't seen any problems. SAS-L is DIST2 and for almost all recipients the >>job is forwarded to [log in to unmask] Maybe Olivier Martin knows more. >>Christian > >Well - reading your answer I REViewed SAS-L (is there no way to >REV the subscribers on one machine only ? It could save network Add the LOCAL parm the the review >resources....). There's not even ONE subscriber from TECHNION (checked >all peers). I positively know of two people who were subscribed >and did not UNSUB (am afraid they donno how to "accomplish" this). >About 5 other people were also subscribed, but I don't know them >personally, so I cannot be 100% sure they did nothing... > >Any idea what could have gone wrong ?? If SAS-L received a rejection trying to deliver to them, then I deleted them from the list. SAS-L has too much volume for me not to do this, and too many people leave without unsubing, or their NAD doing it for them. > >/Zvika > >p.s. - I told the complainers to resubscribe, so that eliminates > their personal problem.