On Fri, 27 Oct 89 15:19:54 GMT Eric Thomas said: >Turgut, you have a strange definition of "up to date"... What really puzzles >me is where they have *managed* to find these outdated tables - it's very hard >nowadays to find 3-weeks-old tables, you find either up to date ones, tables >Revised LISTSERV, version 1.5o, managed by: > NETOP@ICNUCEVM >Peers file version: 89/10/02 16:34:21 >Link weights file version: 89/10/02 16:37:25 It would seem that they updated their tables manually, once. I am cc:'ing Laura to this message, and I HOPE she joins this list. -turgut