I have made a couple of changes to LISTSERV that should considerably improve the performance of 'SIGNOFF *' commands, and should also improve the overall performance of the list-handling functions (basically, anything that needs to access a lot of list header keywords). The change: - Has 1.6d as a prerequisite. - Introduces 2 new modules (1 REXX + 1 assembler). - Changes LSVKEYWD and LSVDEL, plus a couple other modules/files to ensure the new modules are NUCXLOADed/EXECLOADed and to remove obsoleted statements. - Does not increase nor decrease the amount of virtual storage used by LISTSERV in a significant way. - Burns up one extra block of disk space per list, regardless of the size of the list. - Should save CPU time and above all disk I/O in most cases; it is, as usual, possible to imagine cases where it would actually cost CPU and I/O, but these should be very rare cases. I need some help from CPU and/or I/O constrained sites with a sizeable amount of lists (especially large lists) to determine whether the savings are worth the extra cost in disk space (other factors being basically the same). If it is indeed the case, I could, at a reasonable programming cost, extend the function to 'DELETE *' commands, which would then solve the problem of the overhead caused by netwide signoff/delete jobs. In am particularly interested in sites which have statistics on the resource consumption of LISTSERV and could provide me with numeric information about the actual savings. If you'd like a copy, just drop me a note; you should expect a single CARD deck, as the changes are relatively small. There's nothing to configure, just STOP, backup, CARD LOAD and reboot. Eric