> Has anyone else had problems requesting fixes from LISTSERV@SEARN? I'm submitting the request from the registered :contact. ID in PEERS NAMES. Forwarded message: > From @ricevm1.rice.edu:[log in to unmask] Thu Aug 16 16:08:54 1990 > Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]> > Date: Thu, 16 Aug 90 22:09:55 O > From: Revised List Processor (1.6e) <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Output of your job "DBOYES" > To: [log in to unmask] > > > GET 16E-0020 FIX > File "16E-0020 FIX" from filelist LFIXES is not > available. > . . . . lines omitted for brevity. . . . > > GET 16E-0060 FIX > File "16E-0060 FIX" from filelist LFIXES is not > available. > > > Summary of resource utilization > ------------------------------- > CPU time: 17.97 sec Device I/O: 194 > Overhead CPU: 1.75 sec Paging I/O: 16 > CPU model: 9375 DASD model: 9335 > Eric?