Could someone explain the difference between shortbsmtp and fullbsmtp? I don't understand why this makes a difference in the routing of the mail. You can see from the following that shortbsmtp gives a normal direct route whereas fullbsmtp causes a circuitous route through several mailers. ....Kent =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=FULLBSMTP=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= FROM LISTSERV: > q banyan-l Distribution options for Kent Percival <[log in to unmask]>, list BANYAN-L: Ack= No, Mail= Yes, Files= Yes, Repro= No, Header= Full(BSMTP), Conceal= No HEADER: %Received: from UOGUELPH by VM.UOGUELPH.CA (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 6843; % Wed, 27 Mar 91 12:49:21 EST %Received: from ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca by vm.uoguelph.ca (IBM VM SMTP R1.2.2MX) % with TCP; Wed, 27 Mar 91 12:49:18 EST %Received: from PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU by ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca with BSMTP id <23248> % Wed, 27 Mar 1991 12:46:31 -0500 %Received: from PUCC.BITNET by PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU (Mailer R2.08 Beta) with BSMTP % id 5990; Wed, 27 Mar 91 12:46:57 EST %Received: from AKRONVM by AKRONVM.UAkron.Edu (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 3389; % Wed, 27 Mar 91 10:59:59 EST %Received: from ucdavis.ucdavis.edu by vm1.cc.UAKRON.EDU (IBM VM SMTP R1.2.2MX) % with TCP; Wed, 27 Mar 91 10:59:53 EST %Received: by ucdavis.ucdavis.edu (5.61/UCD2.03) id AA09426; Wed, % 27 Mar 91 07:59:49 -0800 %Received: from banyan.usace.mil by longbow.usace.mil (4.0/SMI-4.0(SPK MX)) id % AA27653; Wed, 27 Mar 91 07:50:01 PST %Received: by banyan.usace.mil with VINES ; Wed, 27 Mar 91 07:57:32 PST %Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]> %Newsgroups: bit.listserv.banyan-l %Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1991 10:52:45 -0500 %Reply-To: Banyan Networks Discussion List <[log in to unmask]> %Sender: Banyan Networks Discussion List <[log in to unmask]> %From: [log in to unmask] %Subject: re: X.400 gateway ??? %X-To: [log in to unmask] %To: Multiple recipients of list BANYAN-L <BANYAN-L@AKRONVM> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-SHORTBSMTP=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= FROM LISTSERV: > q banyan-l Distribution options for Kent Percival <[log in to unmask]>, list BANYAN-L: Ack= No, Mail= Yes, Files= Yes, Repro= No, Header= Short(BSMTP), Conceal= No HEADER: %Received: from UOGUELPH by VM.UOGUELPH.CA (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 0366; % Wed, 27 Mar 91 21:24:44 EST %Received: from vm.utcs.utoronto.ca by vm.uoguelph.ca (IBM VM SMTP R1.2.2MX) wit % TCP; Wed, 27 Mar 91 21:24:38 EST %Received: from UTORONTO.BITNET by vm.utcs.utoronto.ca (IBM VM SMTP V2R1) % with BSMTP id 2991; Wed, 27 Mar 91 21:21:35 EST %Date: Wed, 27 Mar 91 10:52:30 EST %Reply-To: Banyan Networks Discussion List <[log in to unmask]> %Sender: Banyan Networks Discussion List <[log in to unmask]> %From: [log in to unmask] %Subject: x.400 %X-To: [log in to unmask] %To: Multiple recipients of list BANYAN-L <BANYAN-L@AKRONVM>