On Mon, 7 Oct 1991 18:32:19 EDT Gary Sponseller <SPONSELL@AKRONVM> said: >I assume that LSVDIST EXEC should be added to the "cannot be compiled" >list since lines 921 and 928 use Interpret... It is obsolete; compile it with the ERASE command (it's free, and it produces much more compact code than the REXX compiler :-) ). >Should I just go for all 126? It all depends on how much storage constrained you are. Writing an EXEC to LISTFILE LSV* EXEC/XEDIT, exclude the fileids in NOREXXC file and compile the rest is very easy, so if you don't care about virtual storage it may be the simplest solution. >Or should I use the most-often-used EXECs from the results from a CMS >EXECMAP command on the server console? Currently, I see only 20 >heavily-used EXECs on this map... These and LSVPROF should definitely be compiled. >Do very short EXECs matter? No idea, but you can benchmark it yourself. Eric