>See Eric Thomas' response to item 3. I think he has a point. Can we use >a name other than "listserv"? >Steve We could change the address, I suppose, but the program itself will still identify itself as 'Listserv 5.2' on the header-line it automatically appends to every message. I'd rather not change THAT because, well, it's not my program to rename :-) but yes, I could change the address it answers to. (Quite honestly, I disagree with Mr. Thomas...I think it will be far more confusing to change the name...Joe User thinks that all list serving programs are "listserv"--I've had recent evidence of this in people's comments about registrar-l. Perhaps instead Mr. Thomas should be working with the Unix listserv people to enhance compatibility...