> Am >I correct in assuming that the MTA at the sending node is trashing the RFC >headers by placing them in an improper order ? And if I am correct - there is >nothing that I can do on this end ? > > >>Received: from CORNELLC by PCCVM.BITNET (Mailer R2.08) with BSMTP id 2486; Wed >, >> 18 Dec 91 11:29:27 PST >>Received: from CORNELLC by CORNELLC (Mailer R2.08A) with BSMTP id 7717; Wed, 1 >8 >> Dec 91 14:28:15 EST >>Received: from HAMLET by CORNELLC.cit.cornell.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with TCP; >> Wed, 18 Dec 91 14:28:14 EST >>Date: Wed, 18 Dec 1991 13:28 CDT >>From: [log in to unmask] >>Subject: SUB CANINE-L Charlotte Burr >>To: [log in to unmask] >>Message-id: <[log in to unmask]> >>X-Envelope-to: [log in to unmask] >>X-VMS-To: IN%"[log in to unmask]" What's wrong with the order of the headers? ---------- Mark J Strawcutter BitNet: MJSTRAW@IUP Director, Systems and Communications DNS (mx): [log in to unmask] Indiana University of Pennsylvania Voice: (412) 357-4000 Indiana, PA 15705 "you can't nail jello to a tree"