As you may know, the following (kind of) message is regularly posted to the nodmgt-l list. What are the con's of using this info (deleted nodes) to purge subscribers from lists that one maintains e.g., QUIET DEL * *@bucknell (etc) /Pete - - The original note follows - - Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 14:19:58 CET Sender: Node Management <[log in to unmask]> From: Hans-Ulrich Giese <[log in to unmask]> Subject: new/del nods for 9211 friends, it's again time for new tables, so here comes the list of new/del nodes for 9211 : new nodes: ACADEM01 0713 MX BITNET UTPVM1 2052 PA BITNET IUAZURE 0794 US BITNET LBDRSCS 0799 US BITNET NIHCOCC 0817 US BITNET NIHOD31E 0833 US BITNET PSUBEH1 0914 US BITNET PSUEDVAX 0992 US BITNET PSULEPSJ 1296 US BITNET PSULEPS5 1660 US BITNET RIGEL 1661 US BITNET TAHOMA 1686 US BITNET TCUFVMS 1745 US BITNET WISCPS 2061 US BITNET CNEIPH51 0112 CH EARN DHDIBMIP 0204 DE EARN EARNCC 0351 FR EARN IRMICMAT 0467 IT EARN IRMRETI 0623 IT EARN SUYARS 0712 SU EARN deleted nodes: BKNLVMS BNLVMA BNLVMXA BUCKNELL CGEHCU61 CORNELLE CORNELLF DBNPIB5 DHDIBM1B DM0MPB51 FRORL01 GBGBOX IPDUNIV PRATT PSULEPSI PSULEPSR QCVAX SFBSYS TUFTS UGACDC1 UGA205 UTORDAIS VPIVAX6 VTELLIPS VTHOBBES VTNFNITY VTYR