On 20 Nov 1992 23:03:14 GMT [log in to unmask] (Eric Thomas) said: ... >My complaint is that your server identifies itself as 'unix listserv >version x.y' or something similar. Many users won't read the helpfile in >which you explain which is which. I would like you to change this >misleading identifier to something like 'unix list manager version x.y', >or you could choose a "name" for your server like the Mailbase folks did. >As long as it doesn't say "listserv for unix" or something similar, I >don't care what you call it. And "unix list server version x.y" canNOT be considered acceptable wording, for obvious reasons. >since unix is unanimously considered to be the system of the future I most strenuously object to this concept, specifically in relation to the CASUAL COMPUTER USER. At the rate unix is developing, it will need at least 10-15 more years before becoming anything resembling a user-friendly environment. No application I have tried on unix gives me a feeling of "Hey, this looks like it's easy to use!". (even MS/PC-DOS is less unfriendly!) Regards. $$/