On Thu, 11 Feb 1993 15:12:28 CST, Natalie Maynor <RA@MsState> wrote: >One of the subscribers on WORDS-L is claiming that suddenly a couple of >days ago the REPLY-TO line in his list mail changed from [log in to unmask] >uga.edu to [log in to unmask] ... A few days ago, the monthly update of the BITNET tables was distributed. One of the changes was to "register" the fact that the subscriber's node (NCSUADM) is using a "mailer" package. Thus, LISTSERV now sends all E-mail for users at NCSUADM to 'MAILER@NCSUADM', rather than "directly" to the user. Correlation! Implied Causality? Perhaps! :-) --- * * Information from the VERS9302 BITEARN NODES file: * * :node.NCSUADM * :lastup.REP 19930122 VMSP@NCSUVM ------------> yyyymmdd <------------ Recent, eh? * :machine.IBM 3090-180 * :netsoft.JES2 4.1.0 * :routtab.JES2 V2 O=19 (NETSERV,NSYSCDD@NCSUADM) * :system.MVS/ESA * :servers1.MAILER@NCSUADM(MAIL,ND PU,M,BSMTP,P_CDESHONG) * :p_cdeshong.Craig DeShong;NSYSCDD@NCSUADM;+1 919 515.2794 * :internet.ncsuadm.acs.ncsu.edu * >and that now when he uses the 'reply' >command to list mail his postings seem to vanish. This is a separate, but quite-possibly related, problem. >Here's his latest description of the problem. I'll leave the headers >on it to show you what list mail looks like when I receive it. It may have been more edifying to see exactly what GGS received! >> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1993 14:04:00 EST >> Reply-To: English Language Discussion Group <[log in to unmask]> >> Sender: English Language Discussion Group <[log in to unmask]> >> From: gilbertsmith <[log in to unmask]> >> Subject: Getting Ridiculous >> Comments: To: English Language Discussion Group <[log in to unmask]> >> To: Natalie Maynor <[log in to unmask]> >> >> This is getting ridiculous. Every message has a uga.bitnet >> reply line, and when I reply, it never shows up. I checked my >> old messages and, until Feb 9, they all had uga.cc.uga.edu reply-lines. >> ... >> Somebody please change the REPLY line back to .edu. Please! ^^^^^^^^ The "list-owner" for the WORDS-L must update the list-definition, e.g., change a line to read: "REPLY-TO= [log in to unmask],Respect" for this to happen.