On Fri, 30 Jul 1993 18:43:26 CDT Marty Hoag <[log in to unmask]> said: > The key thing is that the destination of the 2nd message may be >different from the first. I think that was what the owner wanted which >prompted us to use lsvimail. The "survey" message is sent directly to >the person who requested to be added while the ADDREQ1 (or whatever) is >sent to the owner (with cc: to requester as I recall). No problem: the target's address is available to the exit, whereas you can use listname-request for the list owner's address or, if you really need the actual address, extract it from the list header via LSVKEYWD. Eric