>LISTSERV doesn't attempt to interpret error texts - it's a hopeless task. >Instead it uses the numeric codes. If the code says "this address doesn't >exist", LISTSERV deletes the recipient. It just can't second guess the >sanity of the system issuing this diagnostic. But it didn't do it before 1.8, did it? Seems to me that its handling of this sort of error, which is usually much less of a problem than systems holding undelivered messages for X days before telling the listowner about it (grrrrrr...), is unduly harsh and arbitrary. It's *easy* to set a bad address nomail, so 'renew' will eventually delete it, or delete it. OTOH, there's nothing to do except grin and bear it when you know that you'll be getting bounce messages from somewhere for the next X days. WRT the specific address that caused me to write, it's ironic that I received a personal note from the very same person at almost exactly the same time that the auto-deletion message got here. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- neal [log in to unmask] 412-624-0097 (office) [log in to unmask] 412-624-7397 (fax) Owner: [log in to unmask] "Baseball (and Lesser Sports) Discussion List"