Since several people have asked about: >By the way, Eric has pointed out to me that my mailer now puts in >a Reply-To: field (nothing I can do about it but gripe) so if you >want to reply to the list you'll have to do it manually. Sorry. here is further explanation. Less than a fortnight ago, after a post to this list, Eric sent me a private note asking why I was inserting a Reply-To: field in my messages, as that cancels the Reply-To: of the list header (my words, not his, forgive me if it isn't technically accurate, I'm speaking only of the practical effect). I told him it wasn't my doing, it was the mailer, which had been changed, and there was nothing I could do about it. So, I send in another message to this list and make a fool of myself by mentioning it, and, behold, the header has the Reply-To: field in it. I can guarantee that LSTOWN-L did exhibit the "no Reply-To" behavior previously and that our list at UBVM still does. Anything from me has no "Reply-To," only my "From:" field, which means an autommatic reply is sent only to me, not the list. So that's the situation, as I understand it, and the explanation for writing what I did. For all I know Eric changed the code at SEARN after I answered his note. I don't know. Douglas Douglas Winship Austin, Texas [log in to unmask] Secondary AUTOCAT Listowner