Eric has clarified the issue about having the list headers be public: > The discussion is not about making the list of subscribers non public, > which makes perfect sense, but about making the list header non public, > that is, the name of the list, the various configuration options, and the > description of the list that you normally find in the header. This has > nothing to do with privacy as it does not include anyone's name, except > for the list owner's, but then it seems difficult to run a large list > without revealing your name :-) Yes, the issue that has been raised is not privacy, but security. I would like very much to keep one item of information private-- the editor address. I run a moderated list with the editor address different from the owner address. It is an account with a different username on a different machine. I do not want to receive any mail other than messages submitted to the list on that account. Making my editor address public serves no useful purpose. All it does is provide nasty people with the information they need to forge messages to the list. I have two ideas: 1) make the review command skip editor lines. People who want to make the editor public in the list header can do so by putting the address in as comments. 2) make it possible for the list owner to mark lines to exclude from review--for instance by using + in column 1 instead of *. This would also make it possible to hide the filter lines as well. Hiding the editor from review is not enough. The messages to my list are now distributed with a Resent-from: header line that gives the editor address. I'd like the LISTSERVer to take out that line from the message header. Peace, Dan << Daniel D. Wheeler Internet: [log in to unmask] >> << University of Cincinnati Bitnet: wheeler@ucbeh >>