In a previous article, [log in to unmask] (Kathleen E. Buller) says: > > >I am interested in finding a host for two proposed lists. > >The first one would be devoted to discussion of issues and contracts >related to public employee unionism, specifically AFSCME, but other >unions would be welcome as well. This list would service the ordinary >worker, and be a forum for discussions involving political activisim, >grievances (no names!), local and world issues, and anything involving >public sector unions and their members. This would not be a moderated >list, nor would subscribership be restricted (in other words, managers >welcome, though not necessarily well-tolerated ;-) ). However, the >listowner (me) would be willing to be responsible for its maintenance, >trouble-shooting and overall demeanour (consistent troublemakers may >be warned and eventually bounced from the list, but my definition of >"troublemaker" is quite liberal and it takes a lot to get me that >angry!). > >The other list would be a far more fun one. It would be devoted to the discussion of "oldies" rock and roll artists (pre-1970) and for publication of >their schedules, news, etc. > If your mailer did not show the previous paragraph completely, it's regarding the creation of an "oldies" list for rock and roll artists (pre-1970), and for publication of news and schedules. Sorry if the message "blipped" on you! I didn't see the problem until it was already posted. >I expect the public employee list would eventually come to be quite busy >and perhaps take up some time and space on the part of the host. I would >like to make that as easy as possible, and would cooperate fully with any >host server's requirements (except for money--I don't have any). > >The oldies list may eventually become busy too, but I may have some helpers >to aid in list maintenance (this may be true in the other list as well). > >I do know someother listowners and realize that a listserv can be an >Excedrin headache #250, but I would like prospective hosts to know that >I am willing to lrn and spend some time on this. If anyone has any >suggestions or warnings, or other things to say (please, have mercy) >I would really like to hear them. Thanks for reading this far. > >-- >Katie Buller >[log in to unmask] >[log in to unmask] > > -- Katie Buller [log in to unmask] [log in to unmask]