On Tue, 1 Nov 1994 08:38:01 LCL SUVM Network Manager said: >On Mon, 31 Oct 1994 23:35:30 EST Bill Gruber said: >>On Mon, 31 Oct 1994 20:33:59 CST Bill Harvey said: >>>How 'bout adding an option to the Reply-To keyword syntax. Something like: >>> * Reply-to= (destination),Respect | Ignore | Also >> >>Well, except for the Also option, LISTSERV already does that. >> >>Bill Gruber >>City University of New York > >I think LISTSERV can do all of it already. > >(destination) can be List | Sender | Both | None | "address" Um, what if I do a Reply-To: [log in to unmask] List|Sender|Both|None|"address" doesn't address that at all. Depending on Respect|Ignore, either the list default will override my intent, or responses will be aimed at Eric, ignoring the list's default behavior. I like this idea. It would be a help with misconfigured POP mail clients that insert Reply-To's by default (aiming back at the From: address!) that I (used to?) see all too often. I switched to "Ignore" on several local lists because of those misconfigured clients; if I had an "Also" choice besides Respect and Ignore, I'd have used that. * Intelligence demands reasons, not rules.