On Mon, 29 May 1995 10:31:28 +0200 Herman Van Uytven <[log in to unmask]> said: >Listserv seems to reply to the address is the Sender field. This seems >not correct to me, although I guess there is a good technical or >historical reason. Why does it seem incorrect? :-) What seems incorrect to me is the gateway's behaviour. I can only see two possibilities: 1. The gateway inserts the "Sender:" field because it wants this field to be used by programs for some reason or other. Indeed LISTSERV uses the field as the gateway expected. The real question is why the gateway does that, given that you say this address doesn't work. 2. The gateway inserts the "Sender:" field for aesthetical reasons, in the hope that it will not be used by any program. Well, that does not seem very smart to me. Eric