From: lstsrv-l To: Multiple recipients of list LSTSRV-L Subject: Re: A question about site licenses Date: Tuesday, August 15, 1995 9:22AM >> The only freebie that can remotely compare to Listserv is listproc >> 6.0c. I have used both, and am now VERY much in the listserv camp. > My sentiments exactly. > > We had all our lists running under LISTPROC, until the developer decided > he was going to sell it. It more or less works, but it's convoluted > and difficult to understand and maintain; we weren't about to pay for > it. We discovered the UNIX port of LISTSERV and the rest is history. > For what we paid, it's a great deal. We have no complaints! > > We might be unusual here in that our company has always been suspicious > of free packages. We'd rather pay for software so that we're assured > of support when we need it. I'm glad the most of us and LSoft think so. I just wish MS thought so. MS have that attitude that people would rather get the software cheaper and pay $150.00 per phone call to solve the bugs in their own software. I'm glad that LSoft don't take this approach and I think that their price is very reasonable. We use the NT version. Von W. Rix [log in to unmask] Tri-Service Toxicology Consortium Wright-Patterson AFB, OH http://www.navy.al.wpafb.af.mil