On 17 Aug 95 at 19:47, Mark_Strawcutter wrote: > >What we have to do is be ready to stuff his PO box, his real home > >address mail box, and tie up his phones the next time he hits. If > >his figures are correct, and we can get a good portion of our > >subscribers to participate in a concerted effort, we should be able > >to get him in his wallet. > I agree such activities would be annoying, but how would they "get > him in his wallet"? By keeping real customers from being able to > reach him? You also now become as bad as he is by participating in harrasing activities. Just because your motives are better does not make the actions acceptable.