At 2:24 PM 9/12/95, Maureen Leblanc wrote: >>From: Michael Dickson <[log in to unmask]> >> >>My apologies. This has been fixed. Placing some additional capacity >>on the floor caused some problems with resolution of DNS names (too >>many responses for some clients to handle). >> >>Mike As Mike's tech folks probably told him, having *one* MX record and 10 A records associatd with it is a BAD idea. Much better would be to have 10 MX records with the same priority level -- that would accomplish the same thing in a MUCH more transportable way, and at the nameserver level, not at the resolver level. However, that's not list-owner related at all, so follow-ups directly to me, please... Lee Silverman [log in to unmask] http://www.netspace.org/users/lee/ Someday we're going to look back on all this and tape over it.