On Tue, 5 Sep 1995 20:45:16 +0200 Eric Thomas said: >On Tue, 5 Sep 1995 20:02:37 +0200 Turgut Kalfaoglu ><[log in to unmask]> said: > >>And, can we begin hoping for an OS/2 version? -turgut > >The 12 customer offer still stands. Find me 12 customers who will buy a >license (not the shareware version, the normal commercial version, any >capacity) and we will port it. This does not include people who are >totally convinced that we will sell 2,000,000 copies of LISTSERV if we >port it to OS/2. There are many such people, but unless they're >interested in actually making a purchase themselves, they don't count, >because convictions don't pay bills. I've been making this offer for over >a year and have yet to see more than 3 names. Incidentally, I thought We'd at least think about it. I would buy a LMail for OS/2, depending on price and if it replaced sendmail entirely. >OS/2 was going to be able to run Win32 applications. If that's true, the >Win95 version will run under OS/2, maybe with a tiny change here and It can run WIN32S binaries at the 1.20(?) level. I think Windows 95 v1.0 is at the 1.25 level. OS/2 does now support WIN32S at the source level in some developer's kit. >there to say "OS/2" rather than "Windows 4.0" and the like. If you want >to try this I recommend a non-graphical install (intel.zip + unzip with >long filename support + installation guide). > > Eric /ahw