On Tue, 6 Aug 1996, Aldo-Pier Solari wrote: > Off course, anonymous mails (am) can be tracked! (and, eventually, > the mail be connected to a person's identity). If the anonymous user chains three or more remailers together, and applies PGP encryption at each point in the chain, then the origin of the mail *cannot* be traced. > If an am is enough unlawful, it will be tracked. In Sweden, there > was trouble regarding an anonymous mailer in .FI. That would be anon.penet.fi, which is still in operation. Abusive e-mail received through it should be reported to [log in to unmask] > Anonymous mailers should be abolished. People who would like to > exchange certain information (victims of sexual abuse or other kinds > of violence, etc.) may always get a number account in a .com > provider. So anonymity should only be available to people with the ability to pay for it? I strongly disagree. steve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- H. Stephen Wright Music Library [log in to unmask] Northern Illinois University ----------------------------------------------------------------------