At 09:00 AM 8/27/96 EDT, you wrote: >The info that you provided does not indicate a "problem" >per se. > >Please submit all of the headers that you received. You >can elide the body of the message if appropriate. > >/Pete Weiss at Penn State Here is total header - sorry for admission: Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 08:09:30 -0400 From: "L-Soft list server at MACON TECH (1.8b)" <[log in to unmask]> Subject: VPI: error report from GWINNETT.TEC.GA.US To: [log in to unmask], Jim Watkins <[log in to unmask]> X-Lsv-Listid: None The enclosed mail file has been identified as a delivery error for list VPI because it was sent to the reserved 'owner-vpi' mailbox. ------------------------------ Message in error ------------------------------- Received: by gti0.gwinnett.tec.ga.us with Microsoft Exchange (IMC 4.0.837.3) id <[log in to unmask]>; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 08:09:12 -0000 Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]> From: System Administrator <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Undeliverable: Re: technology fee Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 08:09:12 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.837.3 Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. To: Multiple recipients of list VPI Subject: Re: technology fee Sent: 8/27/96 8:09:12 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [log in to unmask] on 8/27/96 8:09:12 AM Recipient Not Found [MSEXCH:IMC:DTAE:Gwinnett Technical Institute:GTI0] JimW