I have a number of files on my disk that the system says I am the "owner" of. If many cases, this is patently incorrect. The hardware on which these files reside is owned by my employer, and so are the intellectual property contents. Some of these files are world readable and anyone with an account on this machine can see that I am attempting to assert ownership rights that I do not have! I fear for my job and have attempted to change the owner to the name of my employer, however the system refused to let me to do, claiming that my employer is not a known "user". Well I already know that and I don't understand why the use of illegal substances should be required to own something! NOW I understand what my colleagues mean when they say "Well, this comes from Berkeley, you know..." in an evasive tone! I am going to have to demand that the system be modified to let me reflect the fundamental legal fact that I do not own this files. I also find it insulting that the system claims that I am a "known user" as I have never taken drugs in my life and I am planning to sue the software vendor for libel. As a matter of fact the system seems to extend this defamatory language to my co-workers and I should probably look into the practical details of a class action suit. Millions of people the world over must have been collectively accused of unlawful conduct and had their reputations ruined, now it's payback time!!!