Return-Path: <Mailer-Daemon>
Received: by cecasun.utc.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
id LAA28198; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 11:59:12 -0400
Received: from raven.utc.edu by cecasun.utc.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
id LAA28184; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 11:59:07 -0400
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
Received: from raven (199.76.196.24) by raven.utc.edu (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1a) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 11:57:51 -0400
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 11:57:50 -0400
X-PH: [log in to unmask]
From: "L-Soft list server at University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
(1.8c)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: HP3000-L: error report from PCBP_WEB.PACCOAST.COM
To: [log in to unmask]
X-LSV-ListID: None
The enclosed mail file has been identified as a delivery error for list
HP3000-L because it was sent to the reserved 'owner-hp3000-l' mailbox.
------------------------------ Message in error -------------------------------
Received: from pcbp_web.paccoast.com (206.170.61.2) by raven.utc.edu (LSMTP for
Windows NT v1.1a) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Fri, 25
Oct 1996 11:57:48 -0400
Received: from raven.utc.edu by pcbp_web.paccoast.com with ESMTP
(1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA172019318; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 09:01:53 -0700
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 10:46:00 -0500
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Returned mail: header syntax error,
line "
=_0_MIME_Boundary_21244.3270e308.imhwt300.dcuh029.dcu.ps.net"": No
such file or directory
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----- =_aaaaaaaaaa"
------- =_aaaaaaaaaa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Description: Session Transcript
553 header syntax error, line " =_0_MIME_Boundary_21244.3270e308.imhwt300.dcuh029.dcu.ps.net"": No such file or directory
------- =_aaaaaaaaaa
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Description: Returned Content
Received: from raven.utc.edu by pcbp_web.paccoast.com with ESMTP
(1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA172009313; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 09:01:53 -0700
Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
Received: from raven (199.76.196.24) by raven.utc.edu (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1a) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 11:55:54 -0400
Received: from RAVEN.UTC.EDU by RAVEN.UTC.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8c)
with spool id 3722 for [log in to unmask]; Fri, 25 Oct 1996
11:55:51 -0400
Received: from gateway1.ps.net (192.131.85.2) by raven.utc.edu (LSMTP for
Windows NT v1.1a) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Fri, 25
Oct 1996 11:55:22 -0400
Received: by gateway1.ps.net; id KAA14910; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 10:55:37 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from dcuh029.dcu.ps.net(155.16.72.29) by gateway1.ps.net via smap
(3.2) id xma014843; Fri, 25 Oct 96 10:55:15 -0500
Received: by dcuh029.dcu.ps.net (1.37.109.20/16.2) id AA027468952; Fri, 25 Oct
1996 10:55:52 -0500
X400-Mts-Identifier: [ /P=PSC/A=MCI/C=US/ ; c\pscgcc01\961025105527d ]
X-Mailer: Worldtalk (4.0.2-p6)/MIME
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----
=_0_MIME_Boundary_21244.3270e308.imhwt300.dcuh029.dcu.ps.net"
Message-Id: <M4262.004.u9k16.1.961025155526Z.CC-MAIL*/O=CCMAIL/PRMD=PSC/ADMD=MCI/C=US/@MHS>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 10:46:00 -0500
Reply-To: "Martin.Lemont" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender: HP-3000 Systems Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
From: "Martin.Lemont" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Backup goodies & other third-party solutions
To: [log in to unmask]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
------ =_0_MIME_Boundary_21244.3270e308.imhwt300.dcuh029.dcu.ps.net
Content-Type: text/plain; name="Authorized by..."; charset=us-ascii
Message authorized by:
: [log in to unmask] at x400po
------ =_0_MIME_Boundary_21244.3270e308.imhwt300.dcuh029.dcu.ps.net
I've tested the 2 major backup solutions: Roadrunner from Unison and
Backup+ from Orbit. Both are good products. Roadrunner is a bit
faster, but Backup+ uses tape a bit more efficiently. ( It will split
a file between tapes on a parallel store). You have to decided what is
more important tape or speed.
[log in to unmask]
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Backup goodies & other third-party solutions
Author: [log in to unmask] at x400po
Date: 10/25/96 10:08 AM
Would anyone care to comment on the sufficiency of STORE vs. third-party
solutions?
I am supposed to recommend to my boss's boss what third-party utilities
(besides the big three: Adager, Robelle, VeSoft) we should have our
out-sourcer buy before we ink the service agreement.
------ =_0_MIME_Boundary_21244.3270e308.imhwt300.dcuh029.dcu.ps.net--
------- =_aaaaaaaaaa--