As for Sprint being unwilling to censor *content* of messages, just exactly what would we expect them to do? The message you cite does not pertain to Sprint as ISP but as network provider that makes it possible for ISPs to connect. Sprint serves a function equivalent to the US mail service or Federal Express; neither can be held legally responsible for the content of people's letters! The *sender* is accountable, as well as (in thecase of e-mail) conceivably the sender's provider. Looks to me that Sprint is simply trying to make sure that no one can sue them on the basis of material that travels through their portion of the net. Peace, Ingrid [log in to unmask] & [log in to unmask]