You need to enclose the address in quotes or use carefully-selected wildcards. Try this: quiet del vatican2 "[log in to unmask]" Note... check their entry in your member list and copy from there to be sure you get it exactly right. Steve Pruitt >---------- >From: Ingrid H. Shafer[SMTP:[log in to unmask]] >Sent: Friday, December 27, 1996 8:07 AM >To: [log in to unmask] >Subject: HELP! How can I delete this(?) subscriber????? > >From: SMTP%"[log in to unmask]" 27-DEC-1996 00:57:28.63 >To: FACSHAFERI >CC: >Subj: VATICAN2: error report from MAIL.ATT.NET > >Date: Fri, 27 Dec 1996 01:58:03 -0500 >From: "L-Soft list server at TEMPLEVM (1.8b)" ><[log in to unmask]> >Subject: VATICAN2: error report from MAIL.ATT.NET >To: Ingrid Shafer <[log in to unmask]> >X-LSV-ListID: None > >The enclosed mail file has been identified as a delivery error for list >VATICAN2 because it was sent to the reserved 'owner-vatican2' mailbox. > >------------------------------ Message in error >------------------------------- >Received: from TEMPLEVM (NJE origin SMTP@TEMPLEVM) by VM.TEMPLE.EDU (LMail > V1.2b/1.8b) with BSMTP id 3384; Fri, 27 Dec 1996 01:58:03 -0500 >Received: from moau.mo.br.np.els-gms.att.net by VM.TEMPLE.EDU (IBM VM SMTP >V2R3) > with TCP; Fri, 27 Dec 96 01:58:01 EST >Date: Fri, 27 Dec 1996 06:57:36 +0000 >Original-Received: from internet !VM.TEMPLE.EDU ([155.247.14.2]) > by moau.mo.br.np.els-gms.att.net with SMTP ID 0vdWEU.2CgPE8; > Fri, 27 Dec 1996 06:57:30 +0000 >Original-Date: Fri Dec 27 01:49:10 -0500 1996 >Original-Subject: Re: Gerard, please! >Confirming-MTS-Message-ID: <internet15410mo050003620657360> >Tracking-Message: no >Not-Delivered-To: [log in to unmask] due to code >01 > "Invalid Address Specification"; > arrived Fri, 27 Dec 1996 06:57:30 +0000; > Supplementary-info " Destination cannot accept ISO8859.1 content." >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: message/rfc822 >From: [log in to unmask] >Subject: Email Nondelivery Notice -- FAILED MESSAGE > >Original-Date: Fri Dec 27 01:49:10 -0500 1996 >Original-Subject: Re: Gerard, please! >Confirming-MTS-Message-ID: <internet15410mo050003620657360> >Not-Delivered-To: [log in to unmask] due to code >01 > "Invalid Address Specification"; > arrived Fri, 27 Dec 1996 06:57:30 +0000; > Supplementary-info " Destination cannot accept ISO8859.1 content." > >X-ATT-UNIX-Postmark: >From smtp Fri Dec 27 06:57:30 +0000 1996 remote from > internet >X-ATT-UNIX-Postmark: >From owner-vatican2 Fri Dec 27 06:57:30 +0000 1996 >remote > from VM.TEMPLE.EDU >Received: from internet !VM.TEMPLE.EDU ([155.247.14.2]) > by moau.mo.br.np.els-gms.att.net with SMTP ID 0vdWEU.2CgPE8; > Fri, 27 Dec 1996 06:57:30 +0000 >Received: from VM.TEMPLE.EDU by VM.TEMPLE.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) > with BSMTP id 4045; Fri, 27 Dec 96 01:56:41 EST >Received: from VM.TEMPLE.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@TEMPLEVM) by VM.TEMPLE.EDU > (LMail V1.2b/1.8b) with BSMTP id 3358; Fri, 27 Dec 1996 01:56:41 -0500 >Received: from VM.TEMPLE.EDU by VM.TEMPLE.EDU (LISTSERV release 1.8b) with >NJE > id 1773 for [log in to unmask]; Fri, 27 Dec 1996 01:56:40 -0500 >Received: from TEMPLEVM (NJE origin SMTP@TEMPLEVM) by VM.TEMPLE.EDU (LMail > V1.2b/1.8b) with BSMTP id 3338; Fri, 27 Dec 1996 01:55:34 -0500 >Received: from enterprise.america.com by VM.TEMPLE.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) >with > TCP; Fri, 27 Dec 96 01:55:33 EST >Received: from default by enterprise.america.com with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #9) > id m0vdWCH-001w41C; Fri, 27 Dec 96 01:55 EST >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-Priority: 3 >X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 >Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]> >Date: Fri Dec 27 01:49:10 -0500 1996 >Reply-To: [log in to unmask] (ARCC (Assn Rights Catholics Church)) >Sender: [log in to unmask] (ARCC (Assn Rights Catholics Church)) >From: [log in to unmask] (Michael K. Cronin) >Subject: Re: Gerard, please! >To: [log in to unmask] (Multiple recipients of list VATICAN2) >Encoding-Type: ISO8859.1 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >Ingrid: > >Vatican2 is a first-class, forward-thinking list that certainly ranks among >the very best. But I wonder whether we serve the cause of democratization >by excluding those who also "give a damn" about the church but come at it >from a different angle. > >I can appreciate the argument that "we shouldn't have to justify our very >existence". At the same time if we're going to be successful we're going to >have to mix with and "sell" our views on democratization to those who think >differently. > >At the risk of being judgmental, I thought I saw a good man in Gerard, an >intensely caring Catholic, someone who wanted to learn more about Vatican >II as well as contribute some of his own thinking from his own background. >Vatican2 argues cogently for more diversity, tolerance, and fresh thinking >in the church -- yet demands a certain conformity internally. > >Shouldn't the groundrules be loosened up a bit so that we can attract, >keep, and influence the Gerards of the world? It would seem to be in the >interests of Vatican2. > >Mike Cronin >Ormond Beach, FL >