Brian Crawford wrote: > Why 50? I can't imagine anybody having a good reason to mass-subscribe to > 49 mailing lists at the same time. Why not set the threshold to 10 or 5 or > 2 ? Higher than two or five, definitely, or you're going to be discombobulating people like me. I'm on some 20 mailing lists, some business and some pleasure. When I changed from a work account to a private ISP, I re-subscribed to a great many of them one right after the other. Quite legitimately. Make it at least ten, I'd say. Perhaps twenty to twenty five, that's still a reasonable level for people who live on the Net. Fifty is a tad high, but it's still better than nothing, and in any case I salute Mr Thomas for thinking of this and acting upon it. Mario Rups [log in to unmask]