On Mon, 11 Aug 1997 09:50:32 -0500 PHREdd said: >I'll admit: I did go through the documentation, and can't find anything >relating to my specific case: > >We have one user who needs his/her posts approved through one of hte >owners. > >is: > >set sex-l editor for [log in to unmask] > >(valid)? Yes, it's valid, but that's not what you want. You want SET SEX-L REVIEW FOR [log in to unmask] Otherwise you're giving the user permission to post without benefit of editor :) Note also that if the user unsubs and resubs, the REVIEW setting will be reset unless it's a Default-Option=. Nathan