I don't understand what about this posting triggered Listserv to think that it was meant to be a command. Can anyone help us avoid a recurrence by pointing out the pattern? TIA >Subject: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask] > >Your message is being returned to you unprocessed because it looks >like a >LISTSERV command, rather than material intended for distribution to the >members >of the ALL-LIB list. Please note that LISTSERV commands must ALWAYS be >sent to >the LISTSERV address; if it was indeed a command you were attempting to >issue, >please send it again to [log in to unmask] for execution. Otherwise, >please >accept our apologies and try to rewrite the message with a slightly >different >wording - for instance, change the first word of the message, enclose >it in >quotation marks, insert a line of dashes at the beginning of your message, >etc. > >------------------------ Rejected message (29 lines) >-------------------------- >Received: from pop.uky.edu by lsv.uky.edu (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.0a) with SMTP id F3709CC0 ; Wed, 13 Aug 1997 9:19:07 -0400 >Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]> >X-Sender: same one of our staff >X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32) >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 09:19:03 -0400 >To: [log in to unmask] >From: one of our staff >Subject: re: decentralization focus groups > >Please send mail to "a certain someone" at some@where if you want to >sign up for the focus groups on August 26. > >Her return email address is incorrect in her email messages. We are trying >to get this corrected. > >Thank you. > >Tari >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >.....standard looking signature