You were right, Pete. I set the users to REV and found that they were indeed putting dist. list addresses into the To: field, even tho they swore they weren't. Had to send them their own headers to prove the point. Anyway, all's well now. X-TAGS has nothing to do with it. - ed At 08:14 AM 2/27/99 -0500, Pete Weiss wrote: >I doubt that they are using BCC:. If they are, then it is possible that >they are including your list as one of the recipients of BCC: and have NO >primary TO: field. > >If you tell them NOT to do that, and they continue, I suggest > >SET listname REVIEW FOR user@node > >There is a list defintion keyword > >* X-TAGS= > >that might help/hurt your. ---- Ed Agro, Peacenet Balkans Desk, Boston ([log in to unmask])