On Thu, 13 May 1999, Ben Parker wrote: > > As documented in Appendix B, you can only put > Reply-To= user@address > i.e. you can't specify a name. List Header keywords must be declared with an > '=' sign, not ':'. Just devious curiosity. Say you have listowner A who is really ticked with subscribcer B, who has done nothing wrong, A just does not like B. B is set to INDEX as there is heavy traffic on the list. A decides he is going to "get' B. A rewrites the header so Reply-to is B and hides that part of the header. B is flooded with eamil, for say a day, after which the header is changed to normal. If B has a mail system where he cannot see the full email header there is a fair chance he will not figure out what is going on. Any flaws in how that would work? If not, anything to prevent a vindictive listowner from doing it, then claiming it was an aberation in the system? (What tongue lashing, Francoise? I must have missed it.) Douglas