>// JOB >commands >// EOJ > > type format (the systax is probably entirel incorect, I found >this a really difficult thing to get right manualy (I just checked an add >job that I have, that is the format that I have)). Would that not work? >Would that not allow everything outside of the ``// JOB'' and ``// EOJ'' >markers to be ignored? Just an idea that I haven't seen anyone else >sugest, maybe because it wouldn't work, but I'd like to know that for >sure. That's what I've always used, and it's always worked. Sherry Beauchamp Listowner ADOPTION and XCULTUREADOPT